Recommended Reading, Part One
A colleague in
Making History
The American Left and the American Mind
By Richard Flacks
This book is both a history of the American left and an argument about political life itself. Flacks’ thesis is that people engage in politics because of a deep commitment to their own lives, not abstract notions of political truth. The Left’s overarching project, for Flacks, is to make it easier for people to have an impact on the forces which affect them- in essence, to “make history.” This reworking of the left’s role helps to explain it’s failed attempts at grand projects, as well as its often unsung success in democratizing and transforming social relations in America. This is a very good starting place.
The Next Left
By Michael Harrington
I struggled over which book by Harrington to include. I settled on this one because this is Harrington’s first attempt to sketch an outline of what an American left might look like- taking into account our peculiar political culture, electoral system, social movement history and distance from European notions of social democracy. His vision takes from both the old left and the new, but is built around a marriage of radical vision and pragmatic assessment of the possibilities of real politics. I’ve never encountered anything as insightful, grounded and powerful as Harrington in any other political tradition- liberal, social democratic or revolutionary. If you haven’t read anything by Harrington, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist
By Nick Salvatore
Eugene Victor Debs, railroad labor organizer and Socialist Party founder, was a distinctly American voice- for equality, for the dignity of working people, and against the pull of war and empire. This incredible book rescues Debs as a pivotal figure in American history, and speaks of a time when the prairie was radical and the nation was young.
If I Had a Hammer: The Death of the Old Left and the Birth of the New Left
By Maurice Isserman
The 1950’s is an often overlooked period in the history of the American Left. After the boom of the CIO organizing decade and before the explosion of the 1960’s, the 50’s was an important time of transition. Isserman here discusses the transition from a labor-oriented mass left to a more culturally rooted cosmopolitanism would shape the New Left radicals. Also of note is his treatment of the question of whether the American left will be structured around an independent, traditionally-formed political party or a more organic, coalitional model. Well-written and highly recommended.
Labor Will Rule
Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor
By Steven Fraser
AND/OR
The Most Dangerous Man in
Walter Reuther and the Fate of American Labor
By Nelson Lichtenstein
The labor-liberal-civil rights alliance that formed in and around the Democratic Party from the ‘40’s to the ‘60’s was probably the closest the
I’ve Got the Light of Freedom
The Organizing Tradition and the
By Charles Payne
This book corrects many of the popular myths about the civil rights struggle in the South. Far from being built around a few charismatic men, in
I May Not Get There With You: The True Martin Luther King, Jr
By Michael Eric Dyson
As history, this is a deeply flawed book. However, as a window into the radicalism at the hart of MLK’s vision it is quite useful. The mainstreaming of King as a figure has been a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the nation has be forced to recognize that black people’s history matters, on the other, his legacy has been twisted into a sort of brown Santa Clause, delivering niceties to all the good little girls and boys. The fact that his demand that people be “judged by the content of their character” has been twisted by conservatives into a purported opposition to Affirmative Action is appalling. Even more appalling is that his opposition to the war in
SDS
By Kirkpatric Sayle
Students For a Democratic Society was not just the largest progressive youth movement in American history, it was also emblematic of the key dilemmas of the left in the
Personal Politics
The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement & the New Left
by Sara Evans
The women’s movement stands out as one of the major contributions of the US Left to progressive culture worldwide. Feminists throughout the world have been influenced by the analysis, tactics and organizing style of their American sisters. What is important to understand, however, is how much this movement grew out of struggles within other social movements. Evans’ book helps to contextualize feminism’s roots in the broader left, a lesson that both today’s feminist activists and their brothers should remember.
Ain't I A Woman: Black Women and Feminism
By bell hooks
More theory than history, hooks’ most incisive book complicates the issues of race and gender by asking why the women’s movement has been so dominated by white, middle class issues, language and analysis. It needn’t be so, claims hooks, who has devoted much of her intellectual life to discussing the interplay between gender, race, class and sexuality. You can’t understand the problems faced by the American left without understanding how our complex and overlapping power structures function.
7 Comments:
i think it's interesting that you and dick flacks somehow interpret people being involved in activism because of the effect of their own lives, and correct me if i'm wrong, but it seems that this is something to happy about, as if it's more admirable than pursuing the abstract truth. my interpretation as you can imagine is decidely more cynical. if these people are only involved because of how these things affect their own lives, then in essence, aren't all they are saying, "what about me?"
i'm curious to know if you think that activists non-altruistic motivations as suggested by your summary of the book is a good thing or a bad thing? not that i really give a rat's ass, but i am curious nonetheless to see if i've understood your book synopsis correctly. i'd read the book myself, but what would be the point of that, when i can just have you tell me? in other words, i'm asking, "what about me?"
onsdag, mars 09, 2005 10:35:00 p.m.
Flacks' point is that yes, altruism or some grand interpretation of solidarity does indeed motivate many activists and thinkers. This is a good thing, definately. His caveat, however, is that this is less common than political participation based in a commitment to one's everyday, and that those activists who are motivated more altruistically should recognize this in their strategic and analytical thinking. This is meant as a corrective to those who put ideology or pontification above an understanding of where actual people are actually coming from. Activists often curse the apathy of "the people" and wish that they would follow their abstract, theoretical notions of what should be done and when. Flacks' is a construction that helps to explain both action and inaction. There are good things about people's self-investment, and bad things. It's often frustrating, but it is also a bulwark against some kinds of ideological tyranny. This book is meant to inform activism, not retard it. It's a short book, Bob, your lazy ass should read it.
Since Flacks is an occasional Hoverbike reader, perhaps he will respond...
torsdag, mars 10, 2005 9:17:00 a.m.
Nice reading list. gonna check out the Debbs book.
One suggestion: You might like "The Second Bill of Rights", by Cass Sunstein. It's a wishful revisitation of FDR's more "librul" agenda. Pretty neat reading... too bad none of this progressive stuff will happen.
onsdag, mars 16, 2005 12:46:00 a.m.
Okay, so when will the "10 essential Left books about America" list be ready?
fredag, mai 13, 2005 10:58:00 a.m.
Great work!
[url=http://hlurgycc.com/znzb/fiae.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://rkiltjny.com/aoxd/rthd.html]Cool site[/url]
onsdag, august 30, 2006 6:23:00 a.m.
Thank you!
My homepage | Please visit
onsdag, august 30, 2006 6:23:00 a.m.
Great work!
http://hlurgycc.com/znzb/fiae.html | http://snxzbnbh.com/qwdd/cmvj.html
onsdag, august 30, 2006 6:24:00 a.m.
Legg inn en kommentar
<< Home