politics is to want something

fredag, mars 10, 2006

partisani



Taken from my friend Fredrik’s blog, here is a graphic which maps the political allegiances of Italian football support groups. Fan organizations are common in European sports- and range from student drinking societies to labor movement affiliated social clubs to ultra-violent “hooligan”-style gangs. To read the map, “Sinistra” means “left”, and “Destra” means “right.” You’ll notice that some clubs have two or more support groups of opposing ideological alignment. No doubt this makes for tougher conflict in the stands and beyond, but also says something about the partisan stratification which has marked Italian society since the first world war. While in the U.S. we have just begun to regard ourselves as a nation divided between Red and Blue, Italy has been Red, Blue and Black for generations.
I paused on this graphic because my academic work has of late focused on the meaning, depth and function of partisanship in the United States. Even here, where partisan identity is thought to be weak and transitive, and where many voters jealously covet their “independence”, partisan identity is deep and actually quite slow to change. A great new book by political scientists Donald Green, Bradley Palmquist and Eric Schickler called Partisan Hearts and Minds makes the strong case for reevaluating the conventional wisdom. Americans, they argue, are profoundly partisan creatures, and party identity links closely with class, cultural, racial and regional fields of group consciousness. In fact, Italy is used as a comparative case in their exhaustive evaluation of previous studies and reevaluation of available data. This is a must read for political sociologists, and for political activists who are reticent about wading into party politics. In fact, it is in the act of partisan identification that a whole host of core ideological and identity questions are nested. While American political parties certainly don’t look like European ones in their behavior in the halls of government, on the ground they are not so very different.

11 Comments:

Blogger gkurtz said...

"on the ground there are not so very different" -- Explain, please? What are the similarities? I would have thought the differences would be immense.

søndag, mars 12, 2006 11:28:00 a.m.

 
Blogger daraka kenric said...

I realize that was a bit sloppy- I'm talking political identity here, not "political culture" in the structuralist sense. Partisanship is a form of identity, and in that case is fairly uniform accross polities. In terms of structure, function and organization, obviously the US remains distinct...though not always as much as people might think. Parties still -do- many of the same things here as in Europe- in organizing issue and policy formation, mediating political bartering in legislatures and acting as electoral operations. The differences come in the structural role of activists and interest groups.

Crap, I'm blogging my Thesis.

tirsdag, mars 14, 2006 8:39:00 p.m.

 
Blogger The Fez Monkey said...

Interesting thesis, I must say. Don't worry, being long out of school, and a biologist on top, I won't steal anything.

The juxtaposition of sport and politics is really interesting, and I can't think of a more fertile area for that to come together than Italy and their soccer league.

Now, if only the Azzurri can triumph this summer ...

onsdag, mars 22, 2006 3:17:00 p.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

I live in Italy, am a fan of Sampdoria (from Genova). I think that a detailed description of the allegiance of the various fan clubs of the different teams is a lot more complicated than this. For example, in cities with more than one team (Roma, Torino, Milano, Genova) some of the differences are politically-biased, some have to do with subsequent waves of immigration from other parts of the country, and so on.
For instance, in Genova, the older team is Genoa (from 1893), Sampdoria came together in 1946 with the fusion of a local team from a section of town and another one. While most local people with a working-class background are usually supporters of Genoa, and some wealthy kids support Sampdoria -- from where you get an element of left/right divide based on class -- precisely because Genoa was an older team, many of the immigrants from the South of Italy looked toward Sampdoria. But immigrants usually are an oppressed and poorer lot, so they also lean somewhat to the left, in a way.
And so on and so forth.
Luciano

søndag, mars 26, 2006 7:53:00 a.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Pedantic observation:

In ``Even here, where partisan identity is thought to be weak and transitive'', I presume you did not actually mean ``transitive''. ``Transient'', perhaps?

mandag, mars 27, 2006 7:09:00 p.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Good design!
[url=http://cqmmpnbk.com/mmxx/qtbe.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://bratjfzc.com/amlm/dban.html]Cool site[/url]

onsdag, oktober 25, 2006 9:53:00 p.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Great work!
My homepage | Please visit

onsdag, oktober 25, 2006 9:53:00 p.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Nice site!
http://cqmmpnbk.com/mmxx/qtbe.html | http://ozioghzt.com/pacp/pshg.html

onsdag, oktober 25, 2006 9:54:00 p.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Great work!
[url=http://cbpleifv.com/gcmh/itez.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://lycqeggi.com/xaci/dhph.html]Cool site[/url]

lørdag, november 11, 2006 6:53:00 a.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Great work!
http://cbpleifv.com/gcmh/itez.html | http://ukjubhip.com/hhkk/yaem.html

lørdag, november 11, 2006 6:54:00 a.m.

 
Anonymous Anonym said...

Loved the blog about manchester united calendar. Saw a blog about manchester united calendar the other day which was also good. Check out this site http://www.freepremiership.com for live streams, live scores, tables etc

lørdag, februar 10, 2007 1:16:00 p.m.

 

Legg inn en kommentar

<< Home